USACE mitigation bankingSouthwestern Division

How long the SWD division's districts take to approve a mitigation bank, what credit supply they oversee, and how the districts differ from one another. The clock that matters is the regulator's own — everything else includes time the applicant spends revising.

Figures mirrored from USACE RIBITS · ORM · RRS · synced

The read

A bank clears the regulator here in about 8 months — and takes roughly 1.6 years end to end.

Measured against the national median, the regulator clock runs 0.77× it — faster than the country and the full clock runs 0.79× it — faster than the country.

Regulator clock
233days, median
Draft instrument to decision
n = 9 banks · IQR 181–366
Full clock
571days, median
First public notice to decision
n = 18 banks
Vs national
Regulator: Southwestern 233 days; National 303 days. Full: Southwestern 571 days; National 723 days
RegulatorFull
Coverage

Regulatory districts, shaded by review time

Review time by district

3 districts
Review time by district, 3 rows
CodeDistrictRegulator clockFull clockBanks
CodeSWFFt WorthRegulator clocknot enough dataFull clocknot enough dataBanks3
CodeSWGGalvestonRegulator clocknot enough dataFull clock571 daysBanks12
CodeSWLLittle RockRegulator clocknot enough dataFull clocknot enough dataBanks3
Supply

Credits available across the division

Wetland
24,119credits
+24.5%year on year
Stream
1,211,110credits
−6.3%year on year
Species
7,779credits
+133.7%year on year
Demand

Permit applications by district

4 districts
Permit applications by district, 4 rows
CodeDistrictApplicationsOpenShare of division
CodeSWGGalvestonApplications21Open4Share of division78%
CodeSWLLittle RockApplications3Open0Share of division11%
CodeSWFFort WorthApplications2Open1Share of division7%
CodeSWTTulsaApplications1Open1Share of division4%

Recent federal permit applications on public notice

6 most recent of 27
Applications recorded
27since 2026-07-02
Standard permits & EIS · across 4 districts
Open for comment
6of 27
The rest have closed, and remain pending
Recent federal permit applications on public notice, 6 rows
AppliedDistrictProjectComment period
Applied2026-09-24DistrictSWTCity of Sallisaw Solid Waste Disposal Boundary Expansion Sec 22/23 T11N R24E Sequoyah County OK
Stream, pond, and wetland fill to expand landfill capacitymore

The applicant proposes to impact 5,476 linear feet (0.30 acre) of intermittent stream channels by placing approximately 371.5 cubic yards of dredged and fill material within the stream channels to accommodate additional landfill capacity. In addition to the stream impacts, approximately 0.27 acre of an existing pond would be filled with 1,089 cubic yards of material and 0.70 acre of emergent wetlands would be impacted by the placement of approximately 283 cubic yards of dredge or fill material.

Comment periodOpen · to 2026-10-24
Applied2026-09-24DistrictSWGPort Arthur LNG Holdings, LLC - Sempra Energy - Sabine-Neches Waterway - Jefferson County, Texas
10-year maintenance dredging of Port Arthur Ship Canal turning basinmore

The applicant is seeking to conduct maintenance dredging over a 10-year period. The Project area comprises 93 acres of the existing export berth and turning basin along the western shoreline of the Port Arthur Ship Canal within the Sabine Neches Waterway. Up to 300,000 cubic yards of accumulated sediment will be dredged twice a year for ten years from the project area to maintain the authorized dredge depths. All material from each dredge event will be disposed of in approved federal DMPAs 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, and 17. No material will be placed in jurisdictional Waters of the United States (WOTUS). Impacts to special aquatic resources have been avoided, and no compensatory mitigation is proposed. The original permit was issued August 11, 2009, to dredge to an over dredge depth of -48 feet mean lower low water (MLLW).

Comment periodOpen · to 2026-10-09
Applied2026-09-15DistrictSWGPort of Houston Authority/Old River Barge Fleeting Area/SP/OldRiver-San Jacinto River/Harris County
Barge fleeting facility expansion with Old River dredgingmore

The applicant proposes to expand an existing barge fleeting facility within the confluence of the Houston Ship Channel (HSC) and Old River (San Jacinto River). The project will include hydraulically or mechanically dredging approximately 570,000 cubic yards of dredged material from 28.5 acres of Old River to a proposed depth of -13.5 feet mean lower low water (MLLW), plus 1.0-foot of allowable overdredge, and the installation of up to 50 mono-pile dolphins and/or deadmen for the mooring and breasting of barges within the proposed expanded barge fleeting area. Dredge material will be placed into upland contained private dredge material placement areas (DMPAs) including East/West Jones, Adloy, Beltway 8 Tract, Stimson Tract, House Tract, Clinton, Laughlin-Thyssin, Greens Bayou, Pinto Lion (Houston Placement Area), Peggy Lake, Lost Lake, Alexander Island, and Spilman Island, depending on capacity and availability.

Comment periodOpen · to 2026-10-15
Applied2026-09-10DistrictSWGSpaceX / Starbase Haul Route / SP / South Bay / Cameron Co.
Heavy haul route for SpaceX rocket component transportmore

The applicant proposes to construct an approximately 2.7-mile heavy haul route to transport Starship and Super Heavy rocket components and associated launch infrastructure between the Massey Test Facility and SpaceX Production Facility. The applicant proposes to construct an approximately 2.7-mile heavy haul route to transport Starship and Super Heavy rocket components and associated launch infrastructure between the Massey Test Facility and SpaceX Production Facility.

Comment periodOpen · to 2026-10-10
Applied2026-09-02DistrictSWGPort Houston Barbours Cut Northside Expansion (BCNE) Project
Barbours Cut Northside Expansion, Port Houstonmore

30-day public notice for Port Houston's proposed Barbours Cut Northside Expansion project at Spilman's Island.

Comment periodOpen · to 2026-10-19
Applied2026-09-01DistrictSWFMarty V. Leonard Wetlands
Constructed water treatment wetland for Trinity River reuse water, Texasmore

The Applicant proposes to construct a water treatment wetland in Ellis, Henderson, and Kaufman counties, Texas which would treat up to 150,799 acre-feet per year (ac-ft/yr) of reuse water diverted from the Trinity River before delivering it to Cedar Creek Reservoir. The overall project includes the design and construction of a free water surface wetland, sedimentation basins, and conveyance facilities necessary to transfer water into, through, and out of the constructed wetland system to Cedar Creek Reservoir. Available reuse water for the project would be sourced from the Trinity River, originating as wastewater treatment plant return flows which are currently permitted and contracted. The goal of the project is for the system to provide a maximum of 150 million gallons per day (MGD) of treatment capacity, with a peak flow of up to 176 MGD.

Comment periodOpen · to 2026-10-01
Pipeline

Banks proposed on public notice

1 most recent of 1
Proposals recorded
1since 2026-07-02
Bank, ILF and instrument proposals
Open for comment
0of 1
The rest have closed, and remain in review
In RIBITS review
0pending banks
Separate feed — RIBITS bank status
Banks proposed on public notice, 1 row
AppliedDistrictTypeProposed bankComment period
Applied2026-07-29DistrictSWFTypeBank prospectusDEVMBABluebird Mitigation Bank
Proposed wetland mitigation bankmore

Proposed mitigation bank

Comment periodClosed · to 2026-08-28
Approvals

Banks finalized in this division

Banks finalized in this division, 7 rows
DecisionDistrictBankStatus nowCredits released
Decision2026-09-26DistrictSWGBank - Crosby Eastgate Mitigation Bank / Harris County Flood Control District/Harris Co.SWG-2016-356Status nownot in RIBITSCredits releasedno record
Decision2026-09-05DistrictSWLView Point Farms Mitigation Bank ProspectusSWL-2019-216Status nowApprovedCredits releasednone yet
Decision2026-07-24DistrictSWLArDOT-Eleven Point River Mitigation Bank-101115SWL-2021-250Status nowPendingCredits releasednone yet
Decision2026-04-17DistrictSWGBank - Big Cow Creek Mitigation Bank/ Delta Land Services/JD/Newton CountySWG-2020-374Status nowApprovedCredits releasednone yet
Decision2026-04-14DistrictSWGBank - Pine Island Mitigation Bank / Pine Island Bayou / Conservation Equity Partners / Hardin CountySWG-2023-560Status nowApprovedCredits releasednone yet
Decision2026-04-10DistrictSWGBank - Tew Naw Farms Mitigation BankSWG-2023-754Status nowApprovedCredits releasednone yet
Decision2026-04-09DistrictSWGBank - Golden Triangle Mitigation Bank-Old Salem Development, LLC /JD/Sabine River/Newton CountySWG-2022-418Status nowApprovedCredits releasednone yet

About the data on this page

Bank details, status and credit balances are mirrored from the USACE RIBITS registry, the federal public record for mitigation banks. Single-client banks are excluded from supply figures. Credit balances count only banks that can sell today — sold-out, suspended, terminated, withdrawn, closed-out and not-yet-approved banks are left out. Credit classes offset different resources and are never added together. Totals across many banks are rounded to whole credits — a single bank’s own balance never is. Approval timelines come from the USACE permit-processing record (ORM). We calculate the median from every bank’s milestone dates in the division. Full clock means from the first public notice of the prospectus to the final decision — it includes the applicant’s own time. Regulator clock means from the complete draft instrument being received to that same final decision — the part the Corps controls. A median is shown only where at least four banks have both milestone dates. In-lieu fee instruments are excluded throughout. Public notices come from the USACE Regulatory Request System (RRS). Notice text is the Corps’ own; the one-line summary beside it is an AI generated summary.

The map on this page is drawn live from the EPA NEPAssist RIBITS MapServer when you load it.

How these figures are builtReport an issue